Whitehelm Capital - Core Infrastructure - the Better Infrastructure Investment

Whitehelm Core Infrastructure Investing

Core infrastructure: the better infrastructure investment

Whitehelm Capital

 

Infrastructure investments have become one of the most sought-after asset classes in recent years. In a world of low and even negative interest rates, infrastructure investments provide stable cash flows that are often linked to inflation.

However, the very definition of “infrastructure investments” is shifting. Historically, listed infrastructure companies were heavily regulated utility companies that enjoyed a monopoly in their market. But over time, investors have expanded the definition of what constitutes infrastructure to more and more exotic businesses most of which have been unregulated and thus have offered the potential for higher returns. The downside of this expansion of the definition is that these companies also typically have a more volatile business model and consequently are riskier investments.

The distinction between “core” infrastructure in the strictest sense and infrastructure in a wider sense is accordingly a very important one.

In order to qualify as a core infrastructure investment, a company should meet the following criteria:

  • It must have consistent and predictable cash flows, often arising from long-term contracts and regulated revenue stream.

  • Cash flows should be inflation-linked, either through regulation, contractual arrangements or pricing power within the area of its operations.

  • It should have high operating margins and low operating leverage in order to not be too

    dependent on economic and market conditions.

  • It should occupy a natural monopoly, either through regulatory guarantees within a region or country or through a dominant market position.

As a result, the company’s earnings should be non-cyclical and have low correlation with overall economic activity.

In contrast with this, companies that are typically included in common infrastructure indices and the wider definition of listed infrastructure include:

  • Power producers and power retailers that are operating in unregulated markets and thus are subject to substantial price volatility.

  • Contracting and concession businesses that are reliant on debt financing and subject to shorter contract maturities, exposing them to higher share price volatility.

  • Logistics and shipping companies, which we consider to be industrials rather than infrastructure and that are often operating with low margins in a cyclical environment.

  • Bus and railway companies that don’t own the tracks but only the rolling stock. The contract lengths for these operators are typically shorter in nature exposing them to more volatile cash flows.

  • Companies operating in emerging markets where operational, regulatory and ESG risks are higher.

  • Data centre operators and telecommunications service providers which don’t have a real monopoly position and are subject to market competition.

The benefit of a strict selection of core infrastructure companies can be seen in Figure 1. For every industry within the broader infrastructure universe, the companies classified above as non-core infrastructure have higher stock price volatility than the core infrastructure companies. This shows, that a strict definition of core infrastructure can be effective means of reducing investment risks.

 

Figure 1: Average stock volatility of core and non-core infrastructure stocks

Figure 1 Whitehelm Capital Core Infrastructure

Source: Bloomberg, Whitehelm Capital. Data as at 31 July 2019. Past Performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

 

Does lower volatility result in lower returns?

With all that talk about the reduced volatility of core infrastructure stocks one might wonder if we are not putting too much emphasis on the “risk” side of the coin while ignoring the “return” side. For traditional finance theory predicts that in order to achieve higher returns an investor must accept higher systematic risks. Accordingly, in this case according to theory, the higher beta of non-core infrastructure companies should be compensated by higher returns in the long run. Interestingly, however, over the last couple of decades it has become clear that there are systematic deviations from the predictions of traditional finance.

One such systematic risk factor that is compensated with excess returns is the low beta or low volatility factor. Historically, stocks with lower volatility or lower market beta have outperformed stocks with higher volatility. Since 2010, Hedge Fund Research has calculated the performance of a systematic approach to invest in low volatility stocks. Figure 2 shows the performance of this approach relative to the MSCI World. Since inception, the performance of the low volatility stocks was 4.5% per year higher than the performance of the MSCI World.

 

Figure 2: Low volatility stocks vs. MSCI World

Figure 2 Whitehelm Capital Core Infrastructure

Source: Bloomberg, Hedge Fund Research, Whitehelm Capital. Data as at 31 August 2019. Past Performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

 

This low volatility anomaly can also be observed in the listed infrastructure market. Since 2009, the more defensive FTSE Core Infrastructure index has persistently delivered higher returns at lower level of volatility than a broader S&P Global Infrastructure index. The risk return profile is in Figure 3.

 

Figure 3: Risk/return of market indexes since September 2009

Figure 3 Whitehelm Capital Core Infrastructure

Source: Bloomberg, Whitehelm Capital. 3 years monthly returns of benchmark data as at 30 September 2019. Past Performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. All index returns are in USD.

 

Conclusion

A strict definition of what is and is not “core infrastructure” provides two main benefits:

By restricting an investment universe to companies with stable cash flows that are linked to inflation and enjoy a natural monopoly, the investor can generate stable returns in a portfolio and suffer lower drawdowns than stock markets overall as well as more conventional approaches to infrastructure investing.

Secondly, by exploiting the low volatility anomaly in stock markets the investor has the potential to generate higher returns than conventional infrastructure investments.

In our view, core infrastructure investments are clearly superior to non-core infrastructure and worthy of serious consideration for investors trying to diversify existing equity holdings.

 

View as PDF

 

This is a marketing communication and is not, and should not, be considered as independent investment research.  It is issued in the UK and the EU by Fidante Partners Europe Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and is issued in Australia by Fidante Partners Limited which holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (234668).

UK and EU: This marketing communication and the services and products described herein are for persons who are Eligible Counter-parties or Professional Clients (for the purposes of the FCA rules) only and it is not available to Retail Clients.  It is being distributed (a) in the United Kingdom to, and is directed only at, persons who are (i) investment professionals as defined in Article 19 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “Promotion Order”) or (ii) are persons to whom this marketing communication may otherwise lawfully be issued or passed on or (b) outside the United Kingdom to, and is directed only at, persons to whom this marketing communication may be lawfully issued or issued without compliance with any filing, registration, approval or other requirement in the relevant jurisdiction, and in each such case without the inclusion of any further warnings or statements as required by the Promotion Order, or other applicable law or regulation, which are not included in this marketing communication (all such persons together being referred to as “relevant persons”). Neither this marketing communication nor any of its contents may be received by, acted on or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons.

This marketing communication is for information purposes only and does not constitute, and should not be viewed as, an offer, invitation or solicitation in respect of securities or any other related financial instruments and contains information designed only to provide a broad overview for discussion purposes and should not form the basis of, or be relied upon for the purpose of, any investment decision. As such, all information and research material provided herein is subject to change and this marketing communication does not purport to provide a complete description of the funds, securities or other investments or markets referred to or the performance thereof. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice and do not constitute advice and should not be relied upon.

This marketing communication is based upon information which Fidante Partners considers reliable, but such information has not been independently verified and no representation is made that it is, or will continue to be accurate or complete and nor should it be relied upon as such. Neither Fidante Partners, any member of the Challenger Limited group nor any of their directors, officers, employees or agents accepts responsibility for, or duty of care in respect of, such information or its accuracy or completeness, either now or in the future. Recipients of this marketing communication must conduct their own investigation as to the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in it. Recipients of this marketing communication should note that: all investments are subject to risk; the value of shares may go down as well as up; you may not get back the full amount that you have invested; past performance is not a guarantee of, and cannot be relied on as a guide to, future performance; fluctuations in exchange rates could have adverse effects on the value or price of, or income derived from, certain investments; certain numbers have been supplied by underlying funds on an interim basis from the regularly scheduled reporting and therefore such numbers may not be accurate or complete; such numbers may be estimates and may be unaudited or subject to little verification or other due diligence and may not comply with generally accepted accounting practices or other valuation principles; investments denominated in foreign currencies result in the risk of loss from currency movements as well as movements in the value, price or income derived from the investments themselves. Before entering into any transaction, an investor should take steps to ensure that the risks are fully and completely understood and whether the investment suits the objectives and circumstances, including the possible risks and benefits of entering into such a transaction. An investor should also consider seeking independent advice on the nature and risks associated therein.

This communication has been disclosed to Whitehelm Capital Pty Limited (Investment Manager) and, where appropriate, included in this communication.  Fidante Partners or a member of the Challenger Limited group have a minority equity interest (greater than 5% of issued share capital) and fee entitlement in the Investment Manager or an equity interest (which may be greater than 5% of issued share capital) in the UCITS Fund or the Australian Fund.  Fidante Partners is remunerated by fees for services provided and a share of profits.  There is no direct link between the remuneration of individuals at Fidante Partners and the recommendations or transactions tied to services provided by Fidante Partners.  Fidante Partners does not produce buy, sell or hold recommendations with respect to specific securities.  Unless otherwise stated, this communication will not be regularly updated.  Fidante Partners has policies, internal organisational and administration arrangements and information barriers to prevent or manage the conflicts which may arise in the production of non-independent research, including preventing dealing ahead.