The Outlook for Infrastructure Investments
The global economy is slowing down at an increasing speed. The IMF projects real economic growth in advanced economies to slow down from 2.2% in 2018 to 1.9% in 2019 and 1.7% in 2020. Real economic growth in the US is expected to decline; from 2.9% in 2018 to 1.9% in 2020.
There are a number of different recession indicators that have historically been used to signal a recession in the US. None of these indicators have a perfect track record, but if a majority of these indicators are in danger territory, we should pay attention. Thus, we have looked at nine different indicators that have historically been used to “predict” recessions in the US:
- The yield spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasuries. If it is negative, we count it as an indicator that signals a recession in the next 12 months.
- The Federal Reserve is cutting interest rates. If this is the case, we count it as an indicator that signals a recession in the next 12 months.
- The ISM Manufacturing Index. If it drops below 50 points, we count it as an indicator that signals a recession in the next 12 months.
- Quarterly GDP growth. If we get one quarter of negative growth, we count it as an indicator that signals a recession in the next 12 months.
- Nonfarm payrolls. If the average number of new jobs over the last three months is below the average number of the previous three months, we consider it a recession signal. The three-month averages are used to smooth out any outliers that may appear in any given month.
- Existing and new home sales. If the three-month average is below the average of the previous three months, we consider it a recession signal.
- The recession probability for the next twelve months calculated by the New York Fed and the Cleveland Fed based on two different methodologies. If the recession probability rises above 30%, we consider it a recession signal. The level of 30% is used, because historically, almost every time these indicators climbed above 30% they continued towards 50% and a recession followed. However, in some cases (e.g. the recession of 2001) these indicators never even reached 50% probability.
Figure 1 shows how many of these indicators signalled a recession in the US in the next 12 months together with the official US recession dates (grey areas). Even though we use nine different recession indicators they were never triggered all at the same time. Recessions typically happened when five or six of these indicators signalled a recession. Even during the 2008 global financial crisis, the biggest crisis in more than seven decades, only six out of these nine indicators signalled a recession.
With the global trade war leading to lower growth in the US as well as China and countries that depend on Chinese demand like South Korea, Taiwan and Germany, slowing global demand is one of the drivers of the current slowdown. But in the US, the housing market is also slowing down since the Federal Reserve has hiked interest rates for the last four years and thus made mortgages more expensive.
With the global economy slowing down, the challenge for policy makers will be to find the right means to avert a recession. Since central banks in developed countries lowered monetary policy rates close to zero and in some instances even below zero, conventional monetary policy is not able to provide much support this time around.
Thus, there is an increasing number of economists and politicians who argue in favour of fiscal stimulus to avert a potential recession. This fiscal stimulus can take on many different forms, but increased infrastructure spending seems to be among the most likely outcomes of these calls for fiscal stimulus. The reasons why increased infrastructure spending seems likely in the coming years are manifold.
First, there is a massive need for infrastructure spending in developed countries due to years of austerity and cost cutting on maintenance and new developments. McKinsey estimates that global infrastructure investment needs amount to $49.1tn until 2030.
Second, infrastructure spending is politically feasible. Even in today’s world of extreme political polarisation and rising populism, infrastructure spending is something most politicians can get behind. Furthermore, economists have calculated that infrastructure spending is one of the most effective means of strengthening the economy. The so-called fiscal multiplier of infrastructure spending is well above one, meaning that every Dollar spent on public infrastructure projects leads to more than one Dollar of increased GDP. Compared to the flash in the pan that is created by cutting taxes, fiscal deficits due to increased infrastructure spending seems like money well-spent.
Finally, the realisation that economies need to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels to reduce the harmful effects of climate change mean that there is a significant need to spend on renewable energy and the infrastructure needed to support it (e.g. utility-scale batteries and smart grids). Today, large scale government spending projects like the Green New Deal are at least being debated in the US, while the UK and other European countries have committed themselves to generate at least 50% of electricity from renewable sources by 2050. Even the famously frugal Germans are debating a temporary abandonment of their policy not to have government deficits in order to fight the potential of a recession and modernise its infrastructure.
Industry challenges for non-core infrastructure
Non-core infrastructure companies are likely to face industry-specific headwinds in the next few years. While regulated infrastructure benefits from stable cash flows even in times of an economic slowdown due to their quasi-monopolies and their long-term contracts with government regulators, non-core companies don’t have such long-term contracts. In fact, their operating profits often face margin compression as demand for their products and services declines in a slowing economy and thus these companies are forced to compete with lower prices.
Furthermore, non-core infrastructure companies are unlikely to benefit to a large degree from public infrastructure spending since government spending on infrastructure is usually focused on vital infrastructure like roads, electricity grids and the like and does not extend to regulating prices for power generation or retail electricity trade.
ConclusionsThe global economy is slowing down and this means that businesses operating in unregulated markets, such as non-core infrastructure companies are likely to face declining profit margins and declining stock prices. In contrast, regulated core infrastructure investments are shielded from these developments and should hold up considerably better in a slowing economy. Furthermore, there are increasing calls to increase infrastructure spending in times of a recession. After all, many western central banks don’t have the means to fight a recession by cutting interest rates, so more of the heavy lifting must be done by politicians engaging in fiscal stimulus. And infrastructure spending is one of the few remaining common grounds for politicians of all parties.
By Ursula Tonkin (Portfolio Manager), Whitehelm Capital
Source: Bloomberg, Whitehelm Capital.
This is a marketing communication and is not, and should not, be considered as independent investment research. It is issued in the UK and the EU by Fidante Partners Europe Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and is issued in Australia by Fidante Partners Limited which holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (234668).
UK and EU: This marketing communication and the services and products described herein are for persons who are Eligible Counter-parties or Professional Clients (for the purposes of the FCA rules) only and it is not available to Retail Clients. It is being distributed (a) in the United Kingdom to, and is directed only at, persons who are (i) investment professionals as defined in Article 19 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “Promotion Order”) or (ii) are persons to whom this marketing communication may otherwise lawfully be issued or passed on or (b) outside the United Kingdom to, and is directed only at, persons to whom this marketing communication may be lawfully issued or issued without compliance with any filing, registration, approval or other requirement in the relevant jurisdiction, and in each such case without the inclusion of any further warnings or statements as required by the Promotion Order, or other applicable law or regulation, which are not included in this marketing communication (all such persons together being referred to as “relevant persons”). Neither this marketing communication nor any of its contents may be received by, acted on or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons.
This marketing communication is for information purposes only and does not constitute, and should not be viewed as, an offer, invitation or solicitation in respect of securities or any other related financial instruments and contains information designed only to provide a broad overview for discussion purposes and should not form the basis of, or be relied upon for the purpose of, any investment decision. As such, all information and research material provided herein is subject to change and this marketing communication does not purport to provide a complete description of the funds, securities or other investments or markets referred to or the performance thereof. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice and do not constitute advice and should not be relied upon.
This marketing communication is based upon information which Fidante Partners considers reliable, but such information has not been independently verified and no representation is made that it is, or will continue to be accurate or complete and nor should it be relied upon as such. Neither Fidante Partners, any member of the Challenger Limited group nor any of their directors, officers, employees or agents accepts responsibility for, or duty of care in respect of, such information or its accuracy or completeness, either now or in the future. Recipients of this marketing communication must conduct their own investigation as to the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in it. Recipients of this marketing communication should note that: all investments are subject to risk; the value of shares may go down as well as up; you may not get back the full amount that you have invested; past performance is not a guarantee of, and cannot be relied on as a guide to, future performance; fluctuations in exchange rates could have adverse effects on the value or price of, or income derived from, certain investments; certain numbers have been supplied by underlying funds on an interim basis from the regularly scheduled reporting and therefore such numbers may not be accurate or complete; such numbers may be estimates and may be unaudited or subject to little verification or other due diligence and may not comply with generally accepted accounting practices or other valuation principles; investments denominated in foreign currencies result in the risk of loss from currency movements as well as movements in the value, price or income derived from the investments themselves. Before entering into any transaction, an investor should take steps to ensure that the risks are fully and completely understood and whether the investment suits the objectives and circumstances, including the possible risks and benefits of entering into such a transaction. An investor should also consider seeking independent advice on the nature and risks associated therein.
This communication has been disclosed to Whitehelm Capital Pty Limited (Investment Manager) and, where appropriate, included in this communication. Fidante Partners or a member of the Challenger Limited group have a minority equity interest (greater than 5% of issued share capital) and fee entitlement in the Investment Manager or an equity interest (which may be greater than 5% of issued share capital) in the UCITS Fund or the Australian Fund. Fidante Partners is remunerated by fees for services provided and a share of profits. There is no direct link between the remuneration of individuals at Fidante Partners and the recommendations or transactions tied to services provided by Fidante Partners. Fidante Partners does not produce buy, sell or hold recommendations with respect to specific securities. Unless otherwise stated, this communication will not be regularly updated. Fidante Partners has policies, internal organisational and administration arrangements and information barriers to prevent or manage the conflicts which may arise in the production of non-independent research, including preventing dealing ahead.